PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The national trend in the United States is to provide newer teachers with mentors. On-the-job nurturing and support by mentors can accelerate success and effectiveness among beginning teachers as well as prevent some of them from dropping out of the teaching profession, according to a report by the Educational Policy Analysis. The report called “Looking at the Process of Mentoring for Beginning Teachers,” included findings from a 50-state survey of beginning teacher programs instituted from 1983 to 1992. The summary addresses fiscal, policy and certification issues.
Thomsen and Gustafson (1997) points out that an effective mentoring experience leads to beginning teachers’ increased satisfaction and competence in teaching, consequently, professional growth of mentored teachers outpaces non-mentored ones (Spuhler & Zetler, 1994). This, in turn, increases the retention level of new teachers. Before selecting mentors for first-year teachers, the principal and/or selection committee should first look at the process of mentoring. The mentoring process includes the relationship of beginning teacher and mentor, the necessary knowledge and skills of mentors, and an accountability system to ensure success.
Martin Luther King Middle School in the Trenton Public School District plans to utilize the expertise of the District Math Consultant and the Mercer County Educational Technology Training Center (ETTC) mentors to foster a love of math and reveal the ease of the math process when used with computers and technology. We are excited by the authentic hands-on experiences the Matrix Grant can provide, and we look forward to sharing our students’ successes within our real and virtual communities.
SCHOOL AND DISTRICT TRANSITIONS:
As the public school system is located in the state’s capital, the district is home to two high schools, 4 middle schools, and 18 elementary schools. One of the changes is that more of the elementary schools are expanding into middle school grades. The district has been reconfiguring the schools with different grade levels in order to accommodate its major construction projects. The district’s Office of Accountability and Assessment has also suggested in its data collection that its middle school students who are housed in extended elementary schools are performing better on state test scores than students who are in middle schools with no elementary grades.
M. L. King teachers are trying to help middle school students achieve state math mandates in the midst of an evolving academic environment which includes:
· A new district-wide math curriculum, namely Connected Math in the Middle School. This Connected Math program is a highly recommended by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. It is a hands-on investigative, inquiry-based program that promotes students’ discovery and deeper understanding of math concepts and strategies.
· New state technology standards,
· Re-organized district math leadership,
· New school board policies that address academic performance
· A staggering 88 % of sixth graders and 82 % of seventh graders who failed state Terra Nova math test scores in 2002-03.
· Only 24% of students at M.L. King received a math grade of A or B.
· Economically disadvantaged families facing the digital divide with no computer at home and/or no internet access. About 77 % of M.L. King students are at the poverty level, as determined by the free and reduced lunch status report for the 2002-03 school year.
· Budget crunches that prevent major increases in access to technology and professional development
· District-wide construction projects
· A new math facilitator position was created to address the math deficiencies
In a district-wide survey, 60% of middle school teachers and 31% of elementary school teachers surveyed said the district is not providing strong leadership to improve student achievement in their schools. In the survey, 28 % of M. L. King staff felt they did not receive adequate professional development for the changes introduced in their school (compared to 21% district-wide). Another 12 % of M. L. King staff said they were neutral and 59 % felt professional development for the changes introduced were adequate.
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) mandates that the total school and all subgroups (race/ethnicity, total school, gender, socioeconomic status, Limited English Proficiency, disabled and migrant) meet the Annual Yearly Progress (AYP). King’s state tests, GEPA and Terra Nova, indicate a great need for student improvement in math, especially in the Terra Nova areas of measurement, geometry, algebra, problem solving and communication. Terra Nova test scores in spring 2003 have indicated that only 20% of the sixth graders and 36 % of seventh graders were proficient in math.
It is evident that in order to meet the requirements of NCLB, additional strategies, techniques, and programs must be implemented. The fact that M. L. King has already targeted math as an area of critical concern reveals the need for the Matrix grant. The district recently hired a full-time math consultant to address the students’ deficiencies and implement an improvement plan to meet AYP mandates. The Math Consultant provides weekly assistance to the math teachers at King.
A comprehensive system that uses technology effectively in grades six, seven, and eight to improve student academic achievement by 5 % in mathematics is implemented and will be supported by the ETTC’s professional development mentoring program to all teachers and students that are part of the Matrix grant.
LOTI ASSESSMENT TOOL:
In fall of 2003, M. L. King staff completed the Levels of Technology Integration (LOTI) survey, an on-line assessment tool to evaluate the teacher’s ability to integrate technology into the curriculum. LOTI provides a scoring rubric of 0 as the lowest tier and six as the highest possible level of technology integration.
LOTI survey data will be analyzed and evaluated for planning and revision of the program activities by the Math Consultant, Matrix Coordinator, ETTC staff, and key stakeholders in the grant partnership. According to their LOTI results from 2003-04, 44% of M. L. King School scored in lower LOTI tiers (0-2).
LOTI recommendations on how to get to level two include providing a balanced mix of technology training, including a summer technology boot camp, mentoring and modeling, application training, and after-school training. The District currently follows this LOTI model for its ACE grant training at Monument and will have a similar set-up for the Matrix grant. This model allows for ongoing, sustained and intensive, high quality professional development to teachers, principals, school facilitators, and other school personnel. We will also follow this LOTI model for the Matrix Grant. We will also compare the schools’ LOTI levels in 2004-05 against those from in 2003-04.
The district’s Ace and Star-W grant required participating school staff to take the LOTI survey. The district then provided matching funding to open up the LOTI survey to all of its schools. This district wide LOTI assessment provided the district with tools to develop the 2004-07 technology plan for the district, as required by the New Jersey Department of Education. To ensure that Matrix grant activities are aligned to the district technology and curriculum goals, we have selected the District’s Technology Director to serve as the Matrix Project Director.
Another reason the Matrix grant is needed at M. L. King School is because the ALEM Whole School Reform model does not include a technology component. Given that the ALEM model does not have a technology component, King will partner with the Math Consultant and Mercer ETTC, a grant funded program created by the New Jersey Department of Education, to infuse technology into the district’s new math curriculum through in-class support known as “mentoring and modeling.”
ETTC MENTORING AND MODELING:
Matrix staff will commit at least 25 % of grant funds for ongoing professional development to further the use of infusing technology into the math curriculum. We will purchase wireless laptops and use them for mentoring and modeling training, summer training, Family Fun Days, after school training, and other Matrix professional development activities.
Under the direction of the Mathematics Consultant and the Matrix Coordinator, the ETTC Mentor will collaborate with the math teachers to identify the technology and develop student projects that best support the Connected Math curriculum. In addition, the mentor will provide weekly in-classroom mentoring and modeling, lesson planning, and group training throughout the year to the participating teachers. Each classroom teacher will receive two hours per week of training. They will receive one hour of in-class mentoring and modeling per week and one hour of individual, small group, or large group instruction to support this program. These sessions support the mentoring and modeling projects and skills needed to effectively integrate the technology. As these teachers feel more comfortable with the software applications, it will enhance their ability to integrate their newly acquired technology skills into the math curriculum. The mentor will help the teacher post their projects and lesson plans onto the Matrix website.
One example of group training is on First in Math 24Game. We will purchase 24 Game to support classroom exercises in Connected Math, the district’s new math curriculum. The ETTC mentor will instruct teachers and students on how the program can assist students with the reinforcement of the basic computation and provide the foundation for mathematics skills which require higher order thinking skills. Other examples of Math curriculum activities include creating hotlists of websites to improve student computation, creating multimedia presentations to teach concepts, and multimedia quizzes to assess student knowledge.
Matrix grant activities will enhance the current induction program for novice teachers through strategic improvements, including an intensive training program for veteran teachers who serve as mentors to new teachers. Research is clear that the support of mentoring is a key component in helping newcomers to the classroom move from theory to practice. The best teacher preparation programs can only go so far in readying students for the classroom. Novice teachers need on-the-job support and coaching. In order to assure quality support for novice teachers, mentor teachers need training to help them understand their role and how to realize the greatest results with new teachers.
SHARING PROJECTS AND MATRIX WEBSITE:
A Matrix project web site will be established to disseminate teacher-created multimedia and web-based projects that support New Jersey’s mathematics standards, lesson plans, impact of the program on student academic achievement, and other grant-related information.
The Matrix website will have math curriculum links such as Drexel University’s Math Forum, NJ Pep, the ETTC Curriculum web page, and links to other NJDOE Matrix webpages. The Matrix web site will describe the three-year program. Excerpts of the grant narrative and quarterly reports will be included on the grant website. The web site will be reviewed by an assistive technology vendor to determine ways to make the website more accessible for all users.
Participating teachers will design multimedia projects that showcase what was learned from the math consultant and mentoring on a Matrix website, which will be linked from the widely-used Trenton Public Schools’ website. The Math Consultant, Matrix Coordinator, and Project Coordinator will share the program’s activities and/or quarterly reports during in-district and out-of-district meetings and trainings. Also, the ETTC will share sample Matrix projects with other districts and non-publics at its County and state-wide meetings.
NON-PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The non-public schools will receive subscriptions to 24 Game in order to increase their students’ math skills and mathematical thinking and strategy skills. We will invite them to the 24 Game training sessions, as well as offer the opportunity to observe the M.L. King students using the 24 Game software. The non-public schools will also be informed of the mentoring and modeling schedule, the after school trainings, and the small and large group trainings so they can observe, participate, and/or receive training and technical assistance.
EVALUATION:
The Trenton Public School District will be actively involved with the project from the onset to ensure that implementation occurs in its schools for the purpose of complying with state regulation for whole school reform and the mandates concerning infusing technology to meet the Core Curriculum Standards. To accomplish this objective, the Trenton Director of Technology will share projects with the district technology facilitators.
The Matrix Coordinator and/or Project Director will hold a group meeting with all 6, 7, and 8th graders in the first quarter to explain the grant activities, select participating teachers, and compile a summary of thematic units each teacher will be working on. We will then review their LOTI test scores and develop a plan on how to implement technology into the existing curriculum and thematic units.
The Matrix Program Activity Plan will be revised as necessary to ensure that the implementation of the plan is effective and shows evidence that the objectives for whole school reform and the infusion of technology to address the New Jersey Core Curriculum Standards have been met and are improving student achievement in mathematics. Some of the evaluation strategies are:
| An evaluation form will be developed and distributed to school and district Administrators and school staff. | |||||||
| The whole school will be involved in the implementation of the LOTI survey | |||||||
| Quarterly reports will be posted on the webpage and/or emailed to Trenton administrators for their review and input. | |||||||
| The Matrix Coordinator will attend state Matrix technical support sessions/meetings. | |||||||
| The Matrix Coordinator will Review the Mentoring and Modeling Summaries | |||||||
| The Project Director, The Matrix Coordinator, Math Consultant, and participating teachers will present projects to parents, non-publics, and key stakeholders at special events and/or meetings | |||||||
| Annual grant program updates will be provided to district staff and board members (Year 2 renewal and Final Report) via printed copies and/or webpage postings | |||||||
| An articulation agreement will be created and signed by all parties. This will be submitted as part of the board proposal for the ETTC staff. The agreement will outline grant goals and activities as they relate to the partner, fees, and evaluation tools. | |||||||
The Matrix Coordinator will
prepare data for the annual NJDOE monitoring visit including:
| |||||||
The
Coordinator will also collect and report data including:
|
The Matrix Coordinator will work with the ETTC Coordinator, ETTC Mentor, and the Project Director to ensure that all grant reports and activities are submitted in a complete and timely fashion.
PARENTS:
Procedures will be established to keep parents informed on a quarterly basis of their child’s grant related activities from the onset of the grant and throughout the implementation of the grant activities. The procedure will include methods for parents to communicate to the principal and teachers involved with their child in the grant program, such as Saturday Family Fun days, newsletters, e-mail training for parents to communicate with school staff, internet training for parents to review the Matrix, school and district websites, and reports and presentations during Parent Teacher Conferences (held bi-annually), Technology Days, and other school-wide and Matrix-related events.
Students will present their achievements from Matrix-related activities to their parents via electronic portfolio or other method of using technology at the end of the first year of the grant.
Quarterly evaluation of test scores, development of multimedia projects, and teachers’ evaluative summaries, as outlined in the evaluation plan with the objective of accountability, will ensure that projects and training are aligned with student achievement. Teachers and facilitators will create portfolios that include lesson plans, a log of trainings, and students’ samples. These portfolios will be available for the principal and parents to evaluate. We will also address Goal 9 of involving parents by inviting parents into the schools for special events, as noted above. Students will also keep a portfolio of their individual projects. Samples of projects will be displayed on the website at the end of the year. The portfolios will also be used to inform all stakeholders of their own progress in learning.
It is widely held that parents who are involved in their students education and support their children’s academic efforts positively impact their children’s achievements. By keeping parents informed via the newly acquired technology and related skills, teachers, students, and administrators can build a strong bond with the parents.
Download this file as a word document.